Important Announcement


WNA Group Pty Ltd ABN: 82612338253 (https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/82612338253)

An Australian Family Court Judge Shane Gill from Canberra, ACT, ignored the clear evidence that Liqiang Wu’s signatures on the ASIC form and resignation letters were fraudulent, as established by the court-appointed signature expert. Instead, the judge uncritically accepted the misleading information presented by the opposing party’s barrister from Melbourne (a family book co-author with a family court judge) and an instructing lawyer from a Canberra firm, despite the lack of proof. This judge, relying on his old friends, supported criminal activities, failed to return WNA Group Pty Ltd and allowed the opposing party to misappropriate funds from WNA Group Pty Ltd businesses, including:

The real owner has reported this case to the AFP, ASIC, and other relevant government agencies, hoping these authorities will fully investigate this family fraud case and other criminal activities within the current operation of the business.

We must make this announcement as we cannot believe an Australian Judge can overlook criminal activities and accept the opposing party’s false explanation that the original owner was a dummy director. The company was under a family trust—an outright lie. 

Judge, there is no evidence that this company was originally part of a family trust when the real owner registered as the sole director and sole shareholder of this company. Why can’t you call the witness to verify who and when this company was placed into the trust? Why do you allow the OP party to steal money from the businesses? 

WNA Group Ltd is also registered in Hong Kong, China, using the real owner’s funds, not long after the Australian WNA Group Pty Ltd was established. Although it hasn’t been operating, the current operator has not acknowledged this company. This is likely because the current operator could not steal it, as all the necessary materials are secured in the real owner’s home in China.

WNA Group TEAM

3 responses to “Important Announcement”

  1. Be careful, they are all the same. They are very currputed, and government is behind them, to save their asses. They will not let you win, otherwise they will slap their own faces. Even they knew they made mistakes, but the judges would try their best to avoid real justice to be served, they need to scratch their own colleagues’ back. That is why they put section 121 on it.

  2. Can you provide me with details about the OP lawyers? They seem to have done an excellent job. I’m looking for skilled family lawyers who can twist the stories, the most important is to have connections with judges and unscrupulously win the case.

  3. A judge sounds like supporting crime, that is unbelievable. If the crime were real, this judge should be removed as a judge and facing criminal investigation and charges same as the OP legal representatives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *